Flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube whose inner surface is highly corrosion-resistant and an aluminum heat exchanger using the tube

ABSTRACT

In this flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube, the corrosion-resistance, at inner surfaces of a plurality of flow passages independently and parallelly extending in the tube axial direction, is effectively enhanced. In a flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube  10  formed by an extrusion by employing an aluminum tube material and an aluminum sacrificial anode material having an electrochemically lower potential than the aluminum tube material, the aluminum sacrificial anode material is exposed to form a sacrificial anode portion  18  at least in a part of an inner circumferential portion in each of the plurality of flow passages  12.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of the International Application No.PCT/JP2016/073569 filed on Aug. 10, 2016, which claims the benefit under35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) of Japanese Application No. 2015-159193 filed onAug. 11, 2015, and Japanese Application No. 2016-123855 filed on Jun.22, 2016, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a flat extruded aluminum multi-porttube whose inner surface is highly corrosion-resistant, and an aluminumheat exchanger using the tube. Specifically, the invention relates to aflat extruded aluminum multi-port tube excellent in corrosion-resistanceof inner surfaces of flow passages through which a cooling liquid ispassed, which tube may be advantageously used as a heat transfer tube ina heat exchanger, in particular a heat exchanger for automobiles, suchas an automobile air conditioner and a radiator. The invention alsorelates to an aluminum heat exchanger obtained by using theabove-described tube.

Description of Related Art

Conventionally, in heat exchangers such as a radiator and a heaterwherein a heat transfer tube functions as a flow passage for a coolingliquid, the heat transfer tube is prepared by bending a plate member toform the tube. On the surface of the plate member which defines an innersurface of the tube, a sacrificial material is cladded, so thatcorrosion of the inner surface of the heat transfer tube is prevented.In particular, it is effective to increase the number of the flowpassages for improving the properties of the heat transfer tube made bythe plate, so that the plurality of flow passages are formed inside thetube by arranging inner fins. However, such configuration has a lot ofjoining points, giving rise to potential problems of brazing jointdeficiency and possibility of burst due to an insufficientpressure-resistance. Moreover, there is an inherent problem that a fluxused in the brazing operation may cause clogging of the flow passagesformed inside the tube. To solve these problems, it is preferable to usea flat extruded multi-port tube whose partition walls of each flowpassage are not joined by brazing, and which is produced without usingthe flux.

Such flat extruded multi-port tubes are generally produced by subjectingaluminum or an aluminum alloy to porthole extrusion. Examples of thecross sectional shape of the flat multi-port tubes are disclosed inJP-A-H6-142755 (Patent Document 1), JP-A-H5-222480 (Patent Document 2),and WO2013/125625 (Patent Document 3).

In the flat extruded multi-port tube used as a heat transfer tube for aheat exchanger, the cooling liquid is passed though the internal flowpassages (passageways). This tube has an inherent problem of corrosionof the inner surfaces of the flow passages due to the cooling liquid.Where corrosion holes penetrating a tubular wall (peripheral wall) ofthe tube are generated because of a progress of the corrosion, thefunction of the heat exchanger is lost completely.

For this reason, with respect to the above-described flat extrudedmulti-port tube, as is disclosed in the above-described documentJP-A-H5-222480 (Patent Document 2), it is proposed to extrude only agiven aluminum alloy having a specific composition so that the flatextruded multi-port tube has a sufficient corrosion-resistance. However,such tube does not exhibit the sufficient corrosion-resistance withrespect to the inner surface of the flow passages, failing to meetrecent high demands for the corrosion-resistance. Furthermore, since thetube is wholly made of the aluminum alloy of the specific composition,there is an inherent problem that the properties of the obtained tubeare limited by the aluminum alloy having such specific composition.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Under these circumstances, the inventors made a thorough research inorder to improve an internal corrosion-resistance of a plurality of flowpassages extending independently of each other in an axial direction ofa tube in a flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube obtained by extrudingan aluminum material. As a result, they have found that hot-extruding analuminum material comprising a conventional aluminum tube material andan aluminum sacrificial anode material having an electrochemically lowerpotential than the aluminum tube material permits a sacrificial anodeportion consisting of the sacrificial anode material to beadvantageously exposed to the inner surface of the passages of the flatmulti-port tube, whereby an excellent internal corrosion-resistance canbe imparted to the flow passages of the flat multi-port tube owing to asacrificial anode effect exhibited by the existence of the sacrificialanode portion.

The present invention was made in view of the background art describedabove. It is therefore a problem to be solved by the invention toprovide an extruded multi-port tube with a generally flat crosssectional shape obtained by extruding an aluminum material, which isconfigured to permit an effective increase of the corrosion-resistanceof the inner surface of its flow passages extending independently ofeach other parallelly in an axial direction of the tube. It is anotherproblem to be solved by the invention to provide a flat extrudedaluminum multi-port tube wherein the corrosion-resistance of the innersurface of its flow passages is drastically improved owing to asacrificial anode effect, and an aluminum heat exchanger which isobtained by using the flat multi-port tube and is excellent in thecorrosion-resistance.

The above-described problem can be solved according to a principle ofthe invention which provides an aluminum multi-port tube with agenerally flat cross sectional shape obtained by extruding an aluminummaterial, the aluminum multi-port tube being an extruded tube which hasa plurality of flow passages extending independently of each other in anaxial direction of the tube, the flow passages being arranged in alongitudinal direction of the flat cross sectional shape via internalpartition wall portions extending in the axial direction of the tube ina peripheral wall portion of the tube, characterized in that thealuminum multi-port tube is formed by extrusion wherein an aluminum tubematerial and an aluminum sacrificial anode material having anelectrochemically lower potential than the aluminum tube material areemployed as said aluminum material, and the aluminum sacrificial anodematerial is exposed to form a sacrificial anode portion at least in apart of an inner circumferential portion in cross section of each of theplurality of flow passages, whereby the aluminum multi-port tube has anexcellent internal corrosion-resistance.

In the invention, preferably, the sacrificial anode portion exists atthe internal partition wall portion positioned between adjacent ones ofthe plurality of flow passages, in a ratio not higher than 100% of athickness of the internal partition wall portion, and in a ratio nothigher than 90% of a thickness of the peripheral wall portion at aperipheral wall portion other than the internal partition wall portions.

In one preferable embodiment of the aluminum multi-port tube accordingto the invention, a difference of a potential between the aluminumsacrificial anode material and the aluminum tube material is not lessthan 5 mV and not more than 300 mV.

Furthermore, in the invention, it is preferable that the sacrificialanode portion is formed along at least 10% of a peripheral length ofeach flow passage in cross section of the tube, and exposed to an innersurface of the flow passage.

In addition, according to another preferable embodiment of theinvention, the internal partition wall portions positioned at oppositeend portions in the longitudinal direction of the flat cross sectionalshape, among the internal partition wall portions existing betweenadjacent ones of the plurality of flow passages, have a larger thicknessthan that of the other internal partition wall portions.

In a further preferable embodiment of the aluminum multi-port tubeaccording to the invention, the internal partition wall portionpositioned between adjacent ones of the plurality of flow passagesextends with a thickness increasing continuously or stepwise from thethinnest part of the internal partition wall portion toward oppositesides of the peripheral wall portion which are joined by the internalpartition wall portion, and are joined to said opposite sides of theperipheral wall portion by connecting parts having a thickness largerthan that of the thinnest part of the internal partition wall portion.

It is another principle of the invention to provide an aluminum heatexchanger comprising the above-described aluminum multi-port tubeaccording to the invention and aluminum outer fins brazed on an outersurface of the aluminum multi-port tube.

In the flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube according to the presentinvention, the sacrificial anode portion formed of the aluminumsacrificial anode material is exposed to the inner surface of theplurality of flow passages extending independently of each other in theaxial direction of the tube, whereby the corrosion-resistance of theinner surface is improved owing to the sacrificial anode effect. Forthis reason, the flat multi-port tube is advantageously used as a heattransfer tube for a heat exchanger such as a radiator and a heater,whose inner surfaces define the flow passages of the cooling agent.

In addition, since the flat extruded aluminum multi-port tube accordingto the invention comprises the aluminum tube material and the aluminumsacrificial anode material and is produced by simultaneous extrusion orco-extrusion of the two materials, desired properties of the tube areachieved by the aluminum tube material, while the internalcorrosion-resistance of the tube is effectively improved by the aluminumsacrificial anode material. Thus, the tube has an advantage of effectiveimprovement of the freedom of design of the flat extruded multi-porttube to be obtained.

Furthermore, in the aluminum heat exchanger wherein the flat extrudedaluminum multi-port tube according to the invention and the aluminumouter fins are assembled together and joined to each other by brazing,the excellent internal corrosion-resistance of the flat extrudedaluminum multi-port tube permits also the corrosion-resistance of theheat exchanger to be advantageously improved.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C are schematic cross sectional views showing a flataluminum extruded multi-port tube according to one embodiment of thepresent invention, in which FIG. 1A is a whole view, FIG. 1B is anenlarged view showing a part of the tube, and FIG. 1C is an enlargedview which shows one example wherein a sacrificial anode portion isexposed in a different ratio;

FIGS. 2A and 2B are schematic cross sectional views showing flataluminum extruded multi-port tubes according to other embodiments of thepresent invention, in which FIG. 2A schematically shows a viewcorresponding to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1C and FIG. 2B shows aview corresponding to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1B;

FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C are schematic cross sectional views showing variousforms of the internal partition wall portions in the flat aluminumextruded multi-port tube according to the present invention, in whichFIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C show different examples of the internal partitionwall portions;

FIG. 4 is a schematic cross sectional view showing another form of theinternal partition wall portions in the flat aluminum extrudedmulti-port tube according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing a transverse section of a compositebillet used in Examples; and

FIG. 6 is a schematic view showing a transverse section of asingle-component billet used in Comparative Examples.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

To further clarify the present invention, representative embodiments ofthe invention will be described in detail by reference to the drawings.

Referring first to the schematic cross sectional views of FIGS. 1A, 1Band 1C there is shown one example of a flat aluminum extruded multi-porttube according to this invention, in a transverse plane perpendicular toa longitudinal direction (axial direction) of the tube. The multi-porttube 10 according to the invention is an extruded tube having agenerally flat cross sectional shape made of an aluminum material andhas a plurality of flow passages 12 in the form of rectangular holesextending independently of each other in parallel to the axial directionof the tube, the plurality of flow passages 12 being arranged at apredetermined interval in the longitudinal direction of the flat shape(left and right direction in the figures). The upper and lower outersurfaces of the multi-port tube 10 are flat surfaces to whichconventional outer fins (not shown in the figures) made of aluminum oran aluminum alloy, such as plate fins and corrugated fins, are joined bybrazing or other joining methods, so as to be used as a heat exchanger.While the transverse sectional shape of the flow passage 12 is therectangular shape in this example, various other known shapes such ascircle, oval, triangle, trapezoid or combinations thereof can beemployed.

In the invention, as is apparent from FIG. 1A, the flat multi-port tube10 having the above-described structure is configured such that at leastan outer part of a peripheral wall portion 14 of the tube 10 is formedof a conventional aluminum tube material, while a sacrificial anodeportion 18 made of an aluminum sacrificial anode material is providedaround each flow passage 12 including an internal partition wall portion16 positioned between the adjacent flow passages 12, 12. The sacrificialanode portion 18 is exposed to at least a part of the periphery of theflow passage 12 (the entirety of the periphery in this example). Asshown in the figure, the peripheral wall portion 14 constitutes anexternal peripheral wall of the flat multi-port tube 10, and serves asan external partition wall for each of the flow passages 12.Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 1B, such sacrificial anode portion 18exists in the internal partition wall portion 16 in a ratio not higherthan 100% of a thickness Tw of the internal partition wall portion 16,the lower limit being at least not smaller than 1%, preferably 5% of thethickness Tw of the internal partition wall portion 16. By providing theinternal partition wall portion 16 by the sacrificial anode portion 18,the internal partition wall portion 16 is preferentially subjected to aprogress of corrosion due to a sacrificial anode effect, therebyexhibiting an advantageous effect to suppress or prevent penetrationcaused by the corrosion of the peripheral wall portion 14, whichpenetration would cause early leakage of a cooling liquid.

On the other hand, in the case where the sacrificial anode portion 18exists in the peripheral wall portion 14 other than the internalpartition wall portion 16, it exists in a ratio not higher than 90%,preferably 80% of a thickness Ts of the peripheral wall portion 14, thelower limit being at least not smaller than 1%, preferably 5% of thethickness Ts of the peripheral wall portion 14. That is to say,Ta≤0.9×Ts, and preferably Ta≥0.01×Ts. Where the thickness of thesacrificial anode portion 18 exceeds 90% of the thickness Ts of theperipheral wall portion 14, the thickness of the peripheral wall portion14 may be too small after consumption of the sacrificial anode portion18 due to the corrosion, thereby causing decrease of apressure-resistance of the flat multi-port tube 10, and other problems.

The above-described sacrificial anode portion 18 is exposed to an entireinner surface of each of the plurality of flow passages 12 arranged inthe flat multi-port tube 10. Preferably, the sacrificial anode portion18 is exposed to the inner surface of each of the flow passages 12continuously in the axial direction of the tube. However, thesacrificial anode portion 18 may be exposed partially discontinuously,or exposed continuously for a predetermined distance in the axialdirection of the tube at a plurality of positions in the tubecircumferential direction. In the invention, a configuration wherein thesacrificial anode portion 18 is always exposed to the inner surface ofthe flow passage 12 in any transverse section of the flat multi-porttube 10 is advantageously employed.

Furthermore, with respect to a region of exposure of the sacrificialanode portion 18 to the inner surface of the flow passage 12, thesacrificial anode portion 18 is preferably configured such that it isexposed within a range equivalent to at least not smaller than 10%,preferably 30%, more preferably 50% of a peripheral length L in thetransverse section of the flow passage 12 shown in FIG. 1B. Thecorrosion-resistance owing to the sacrificial anode effectadvantageously increases with an increase of the exposure region of thesacrificial anode portion 18 along the peripheral length L of the flowpassage 12. Specifically, the most preferable embodiment is the casewhere the sacrificial anode portion 18 exists along the entirety of theperipheral length L of the flow passage 12. It is noted that theexposure regions of the sacrificial anode portion 18 for all of the flowpassages 12 are not required to be equal to each other, and that thesacrificial anode portion 18 may be exposed in different exposure ratioswith respect to the respective different flow passages 12, for example,as shown in FIG. 1C.

It is noted that the aluminum sacrificial anode material used in theinvention has a lower potential than that of the aluminum tube material.Thus, the difference of the potential between those two materialsexceeds 0 mV, and preferably falls within a range of not lower than 5 mVand not higher than 300 mV. The difference of the potential not lowerthan 5 mV permits stable exhibition of the sacrificial anode effect evenunder severer circumstances. On the other hand, the difference of thepotential over 300 mV causes a prominent sacrificial anode effect,resulting in problems of excessive consumption of the sacrificial anodematerial due to the corrosion, and the like. As is apparent from theabove, the sacrificial anode portion 18 having the lower potential thanthat of the peripheral wall portion 14 and the like consisting of thealuminum tube material permits an effective sacrificial anode effect andmore advantageous realization of the corrosion-resistance of the innersurface of the flow passage.

In the above-described flat multi-port tube 10, conventional aluminummaterials used in production of flat extruded multi-port tubes can beemployed as the tube material constituting at least the externalperipheral part of the peripheral wall portion 16. For example,materials such as 1000 series pure aluminum and 3000 series aluminumalloy according to JIS can be employed. Further, a predetermined amountof Cu may be added as an alloy component so as to increase thepotential. Furthermore, as the sacrificial anode material providing thesacrificial anode portion 18, known aluminum alloy material having alower potential than that of the above-described tube material, namely,having a lower natural potential, may be employed. For example, analuminum alloy comprising a predetermined amount of Zn may be employed.

The above-described flat multi-port tube 10 according to the inventionis produced by co-extruding the above-described tube material andsacrificial anode material as the aluminum materials to be extruded,which tube material and sacrificial anode material are employed in theform of a composite billet having a sheath-core structure. Specifically,the composite billet has a structure wherein the sacrificial anodematerial is disposed within a hollow portion provided in the inside (acentral portion) of the tube material. The sacrificial anode materialhas a cross sectional shape corresponding to the hollow portion, forexample, a rectangle (including one with curved corners), circle,ellipse, oval, a combination of ellipse, oval and polygon, with thecross sectional dimensions being optimized. The tube material and thesacrificial anode material are united and integrated by welding or otherjoining method, such that a sheath portion consisting of the tubematerial is formed around a core portion consisting of the sacrificialanode material. To produce the composite billet, various known methodsas follows may be employed: a method wherein a sheath billet is obtainedby providing a through-hole of a predetermined size in a central part ofa billet formed of the tube material, and a core billet formed of thesacrificial anode material is inserted in the through-hole, and joinedwith the sheath billet; and a method wherein the above-described sheathbillet is divided into two pieces, the core billet is placed in a hollowportion defined by the two pieces, and all of the members are fixed andjoined together, for example by welding or other joining method.

Furthermore, the above-described composite billet is subjected to a hotextrusion as in the case of the conventional flat multi-port tubeproduction, using a so-called port-hole die with a plurality ofextruding ports, so as to obtain a desired flat multi-port tube. Whenthe hot extrusion is performed, the composite billet is arranged suchthat, in terms of the die with the longitudinal extruding portscorresponding to the plurality of flow passages of the flat multi-porttube, the longitudinal direction in the predetermined cross sectionalshape of the sacrificial anode material placed in the inside of thecomposite billet coincides with the longitudinal direction of theextruding ports of the die. Thus, the composite billet is subjected tothe hot extrusion. The above-described method of extrusion of thecomposite billet with the port-hole die permits effective distributionof the sacrificial anode material within the composite billet as far asto partition walls defining the flow passages positioned at the oppositeend portions of the flat cross sectional shape of the obtainedmulti-port tube, so that the sacrificial anode portion is advantageouslyexposed to the inner surfaces of the flow passages.

The flat aluminum extruded multi-port tube according to the inventionproduced by co-extruding or extruding the aluminum tube material and thealuminum sacrificial anode material simultaneously as described abovehas a structure wherein ratios (areas) of the sacrificial anode portion18 exposed to the flow passages vary depending upon the location of theflow passages 12, as shown in the above-described FIG. 1C, so thatdegrees of corrosion of the sacrificial anode portion 18 are likely tovary at the internal partition wall portions 16. More particularly, theflow passages 12 a at the opposite end portions as seen in thelongitudinal direction of the flat cross sectional shape of themulti-port tube 10, namely, as seen in the width direction of the tube10, have a lower ratio (area) of exposure of the sacrificial anodeportion 18 than the other flow passages 12 b positioned in therelatively central portion in the longitudinal direction of the flatcross sectional shape, whereby the internal partition wall portions 16 apartially defining the flow passages 12 a and the internal partitionwall portions 16 b of the flow passages 12 b positioned in therelatively central portion in the longitudinal direction of the flatcross sectional shape are subjected to different degrees of corrosion ofthe sacrificial anode portion 18. For this reason, in the invention, itis preferable that, as shown in FIG. 2A, a thickness Twe of the internalpartition wall portions 16 a which are positioned at the opposite endportions in the width direction of the flat multi-port tube 10 and whichpartially define the flow passages 12 a at those opposite end portionsis made larger than a thickness Twi of the other internal partition wallportions 16 b positioned at the relatively central portion in the widthdirection, so as to assure a sufficient thickness of the internalpartition wall portions 16 a at the opposite end portions remainingafter corrosion.

As shown in FIG. 1C and FIG. 2A, in the case where the sacrificial anodeportion 18 exists at the internal partition wall portions 16 (16 a, 16b), and hardly exist at the peripheral wall portions 14 or a thicknessof the sacrificial anode portion 18 at the peripheral wall portions 14is smaller than that of the internal partition wall portions 16, theinternal partition wall portions 16 are preferentially subjected to thecorrosion, in particular in the connecting parts 16 c connecting theinternal partition wall portions 16 to the peripheral wall portions 14.Thus, in the invention, as shown in FIG. 2B, it is advantageous that awidth Tb of the connecting parts 16 c connecting the internal partitionwall portions 16 to the peripheral wall portion 14 is made larger than aminimum thickness (a thickness of the portion whose wall thickness isthe smallest) Tmin of the internal partition wall portions 16, so as toadvantageously compensate for a decrease of thickness by the corrosionof the connecting parts 16 c of the internal partition wall portions 16.That is, it is preferable that the internal partition wall portions 16positioned between adjacent ones of the plurality of flow passagesextend with a thickness increasing continuously or stepwise from thethinnest part of the internal partition wall portions 16 toward oppositesides of the peripheral wall portions 14 which are joined by theinternal partition wall portions 16, and are joined to those oppositesides of the peripheral wall portion 14 (upper and lower parts in FIG.2B) by the connecting parts 16 c, 16 c having a thickness (width) largerthan that of the part having the smallest wall thickness Tmin of theinternal partition wall portions 16. Here, it is noted that the width Tbof each connecting part 16 c is defined by a distance between the twoparts at each of the opposite ends of the internal partition wallportion 16, which two parts are adjacent to the peripheral wall portion14, and partially constitute the internal partition wall portion 16(connecting part 16 c).

The preferred form of the connecting parts 16 c in the invention isnever limited to the shape shown in FIG. 2B, and the shapes shown inFIG. 3 and FIG. 4, for example, can be employed. More particularly, FIG.3A shows a form wherein the thickness of the internal partition wallportion 16 changes lineally from the thinnest part; FIG. 3B shows a formwherein the thickness of the internal partition wall portion 16increases curvedly from the thickness Tmin of the thinnest portion; andFIG. 3C shows a form wherein the part of the internal partition wallportion 16 having the minimum thickness is adjacent to the upwardlylocated peripheral wall portion 14 in the figure, the thickness of theinternal partition wall portion 16 increases lineally or curvedly towardthe upwardly and downwardly located peripheral wall portions 14, and theinternal partition wall portion 16 is connected to the upwardly anddownwardly located peripheral wall portions 14, 14. In addition, in theform shown in FIG. 3C the upper and lower connecting parts 16 c, 16 c ofthe internal partition wall portion 16 have different widths (T′b<Tb).Furthermore, in FIG. 4, the part of the internal partition wall portion16 having the minimum thickness exists for a predetermined length in thevertical direction, and the wall thickness stepwise (in steps) increasesfrom the opposite ends of the internal partition wall portion 16 so asto be connected to the upwardly and downwardly located peripheral wallportions 14, 14. While the opposite ends of the internal partition wallportion 16 have the same shape in this example, they may have differentshapes. It is to be understood that the shape of the internal partitionwall portion 16 connected to the peripheral wall portion 14 via theconnecting parts 16 c according to the invention may be changed based onthe knowledge of one skilled in the art.

The above-described flat aluminum extruded multi-port tube according tothe invention is used advantageously as a flow passage member for arefrigerant in a heat exchanger. In the case where the flat multi-porttube according to the invention is used as a passageway tube for therefrigerant, the heat exchanger comprises, for example: a pair ofaluminum header tanks spaced apart from each other; a plurality of flatmulti-port tubes which are arranged between the two header tanks at aspacing interval in parallel to each other in a longitudinal directionof the header tanks, with their width direction being parallel to theventilation direction, such that the opposite ends of each flatmulti-port tube are connected to the respective header tanks; outer finsin the form of aluminum corrugate fins which are disposed in the spacesbetween the adjacent flat multi-port tubes and outwardly of the flatmulti-port tubes at the opposite ends of the arrangement, and which arejoined to the flat multi-port tubes by brazing; and aluminum side platesdisposed outwardly of the corrugate fins and joined to the fins bybrazing. It is needless to say that the flat multi-port tube accordingto the invention may be used as the passageway tube for the refrigerantin various known heat exchangers other than the heat exchanger havingthe above-described configuration.

As known well, in the heat exchanger, the refrigerant or cooling agentis distributed from one of the pair of the header tanks into the flatmulti-port tubes, and is discharged from the flat multi-port tubes toflow into the other header tank. For example, the conventional headertanks take the form of: a pair of header plates opposed to each otherand brazed to the flat multi-port tubes; a pair of plates each of whichis annularly bent such that the plate is welded or brazed at itsopposite ends; and a pair of annularly extruded tubes.

Although one typical embodiment of the invention has been described indetail for illustration purpose only, it is to be understood that theinvention is not limited to the details of the preceding embodiment.

It is to be understood that the present invention may be embodied withvarious changes, modifications and improvements which may occur to thoseskilled in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of thisinvention, and that such changes, modifications and improvements arealso within the scope of this invention.

EXAMPLES

To clarify the present invention more specifically, some typicalexamples of the present invention will be described. However, it is tobe understood that the invention is not limited to the details of theexamples.

Example 1

To produce flat multi-port tubes according to the invention, compositebillets (a)-(h) were prepared, which billets comprise tube materials andsacrificial anode materials having compositions (%: by mass) shown inthe following Table 1, and each of the composite billets was subjectedto a hot extrusion so that flat multi-port tubes A-H were obtained. AsComparative Examples, a single-component billet (i) and a compositebillet (j) having the compositions shown in Table 1 were produced aswell so that flat multi-port tubes I and J were obtained by subjectingeach of the billets to the hot extrusion. The obtained flat multi-porttubes A-J were then evaluated by the following (1) measurement of arange of formation of a sacrificial anode portion, (2) measurement of anelectric potential and (3) evaluation of a corrosion-resistance.

TABLE 1 Composition of billet Kind of Tube Sacrificial anode billetmaterial material Present (a) Al—0.4%Cu Al—2%Zn invention (b) Al—0.4%CuAl—0.2%Zn (c) Al—0.4%Cu Al—0.5%Zn (d) Al—0.4%Cu Al—1%Zn (e) Al—0.4%CuAl—3%Zn (f) Al—0.4%Cu Al—8%Zn (g) JIS A3003 alloy Al—2%Zn (h) Al—0.4%CuAl—2%Zn Comparative (i) Al—0.4%Cu — examples (j) Al—0.4%Cu Al—2%Zn

More particularly, various cylindrical billets with a diameter of 90 mmϕfor use as tube materials were produced by a conventional DC castingprocess according to the compositions of the tube materials for thebillets (a)-(h) according to the invention and the comparative billet(j) shown in Table 1. On the other hand, various billets for use assacrificial anode materials were similarly produced according to thecompositions of the sacrificial anode materials for the billets (a)-(h)according to the invention and the comparative billet (j) shown inTable 1. These billets for use as the sacrificial anode materials wereformed so as to have rectangular cross sectional shapes with respectivecombinations of length and width dimensions within a range of 30 mm-85mm. The sacrificial anode material billet for the comparative billet (j)was formed to have a 70 mm×70 mm square cross sectional shape. Then, athrough-hole into which the thus formed sacrificial anode materialbillet can be inserted was formed through a central part of the crosssection of each of the above-described tube material billets, and thesacrificial anode material billet was inserted into the through-hole.Further, the tube material billet and the sacrificial anode materialbillet were fixed and joined together by MIG welding at the oppositelongitudinal end faces of the tube material billet, so that each of thecomposite billets (a)-(h) and (j) was produced as an integral compositebillet 20 having the cross sectional shape shown in FIG. 5. As acomparative example, a single-component billet having the composition ofthe tube material for the comparative billet (i) shown in Table 1 wasproduced. This single-component billet having the alloy composition ofthe comparative billet (i) is the single-component billet 30 shown inFIG. 6, equivalent to a conventional billet which does not include asacrificial anode material billet. In FIGS. 5 and 6, numerals 22 and 32represent the tube material billets, and 24 represents the sacrificialanode material billet.

Next, the thus obtained composite billet 20 or the single-componentbillet 30 was heated to 500° C. in a billet heater, and subjected to thehot extrusion by using a conventional porthole die having extrudingholes to form eight rectangular holes (eight flow passages), so that theflat multi-port tubes A-H and I-J (total thickness: 2.0 mm, width in theflat direction: 16 mm, and thicknesses of the peripheral wall portionand internal partition wall portion: 0.25 mm) were produced.

(1) Measurement of the Range of Formation of the Sacrificial AnodePortion

The thus obtained various flat multi-port tubes (10) having eight holeswere cut at a ½ position in the extruding longitudinal direction, andtheir cross sectional surfaces were examined. More particularly, therange of formation of the sacrificial anode portion (18) was evaluatedby measuring, with a ruler, a region of the sacrificial anode portion(18) in a microphotograph of 25-times magnification of the crosssectional surface. With respect to the above-described measurement ofthe range of formation of the sacrificial anode portion (18), theresults were evaluated as “Good” if the range was not less than 10% ofthe peripheral length of the flow passage (12) (the total length of thefour walls of the rectangular flow passage), and as “Poor” if the rangewas not less than 0% and less than 10% of the peripheral length. Thethickness of the sacrificial anode portion (18) at the internalpartition wall portion (16) partially defining the adjacent flowpassages was evaluated as “Good” if the thickness of the sacrificialanode portion (18) was more than 0% and not more than 100% of thethickness of the internal partition wall portion (16), and as “Poor” ifthe thickness of the sacrificial anode portion (18) was 0% of thethickness of the internal partition wall portion (16). Furthermore, thethickness of the sacrificial anode portion (18) at the peripheral wallportion (14) was evaluated as “Good” if the thickness of the sacrificialanode portion (18) was not more than 90% of the thickness of theperipheral wall portion (14), and as “Poor” if the thickness of thesacrificial anode portion (18) was more than 90% of the thickness of theperipheral wall portion (14). In the following Table 2, the results ofthe above measurement of the range of formation of the sacrificial anodeportion (18) with respect to each of the flat multi-port tubes A-Haccording to the invention and the flat multi-port tubes I and Jaccording to the comparative examples are shown in terms of the smallestone of values of the peripheral length of the sacrificial anode portion(18) exposed to the respective flow passages, and the largest one ofvalues of the thickness of the sacrificial anode portion (18) at theinternal partition wall portion (16) and the peripheral wall portion(14) exposed to the flow passages.

TABLE 2 State of formation of sacrificial anode portion (18) Thicknessof Peripheral partition wall Thickness of Kind of flat length (%)portion (%) peripheral wall multi-port (smallest (largest portion (%)tube value) Evaluation thickness) Evaluation (largest thickness)Evaluation Present A 95 Good 100 Good 80 Good invention B 80 Good 100Good 70 Good C 85 Good 100 Good 75 Good D 50 Good 60 Good 50 Good E 30Good 30 Good 40 Good F 50 Good 60 Good 50 Good G 95 Good 100 Good 80Good H 10 Good 100 Good 80 Good Comparative I 0 Poor 0 Poor 0 Poorexamples J 0 Poor 100 Good 93 Poor

According to the examination of the cross sectional surfaces, it wasconfirmed that, with respect to the flat multi-port tubes A-H obtainedby the extrusion according to the invention, the sacrificial anodeportion (18) prepared with the sacrificial anode material billet wasformed at all of the internal partition wall portions (16) positionedbetween the adjacent flow passages (12), with the thickness of thesacrificial anode portion (18) not more than 100% of the thickness ofthe internal partition wall portion (16). It was also confirmed that thethickness of the sacrificial anode portion (18) formed at any part ofthe peripheral wall portion (14) was not more than 80% of the thicknessof the internal partition wall portion (16). Furthermore, it wasconfirmed that the sacrificial anode portion (18) was exposed to all ofthe flow passages (12) of the flat multi-port tubes (10) along thelength more than 0% of the peripheral length of each of the flowpassages (12).

It was also confirmed, with respect to the flat multi-port tubes (10)obtained by the hot extrusion as described above, that the sacrificialanode portion (18) formed from the sacrificial anode material billet wasstably exposed to the inner surfaces of the flow passages (12) in thelongitudinal direction of the extrusion.

On the other hand, the sacrificial anode portion (18) of the flatmulti-port tube I obtained by subjecting the single-component billet 30having the composition (i) of the comparative example to the hotextrusion with the porthole die did not have any exposed part, since nosacrificial anode material billet was used. With respect to the flatmulti-port tube J according to the comparative example, which tube wasobtained from the composite billet prepared by forming an Al-2% Znbillet into a shape of 70 mm×70 mm square, it was confirmed that thesacrificial anode portion (18) formed from the sacrificial anodematerial billet was exposed by the thickness of not more than 100% ofthe thickness of the internal partition wall portion (16) in the centralpart of the tube J in the width direction. The thickness of the thickestpart of the sacrificial anode portion (18) formed in the peripheral wallportion (14) was 93% of the thickness of the peripheral wall portion(14). However, the sacrificial anode portion (18) was not exposed at allto some parts of the flow passages (12) at the opposite end portions inthe width direction of the tube J, so that the smallest value of theperipheral length (%) was 0%.

(2) Measurement of the Electric Potential

With respect to each of the flat multi-port tubes A-H according to theinvention and the flat multi-port tubes I and J according to thecomparative examples which were obtained as described above, theelectric potential of each of the tube material and the sacrificialanode material was measured. It is noted that the flat multi-port tube Iaccording to the comparative example was formed from thesingle-component billet consisting solely of the tube material and didnot have any sacrificial anode portion (18).

More specifically, each of the flat multi-port tubes A-H according tothe invention and the flat multi-port tubes I and J according to thecomparative examples was subjected to the heat treatment at 600° C. for3 minutes in view of heating of the tube upon brazing for joining of thefins where the tube is used as a heat transfer tube for a heatexchanger, and was cut into pieces each having a length of 40 mm in thelongitudinal direction of the extrusion. With respect to the samplepiece for measuring the electric potential of the tube material, theentirety of the piece other than one of the opposite end faces to whicha lead line for electric measurement was connected was masked with asilicone resin so as to be electrically insulated, such that a 10 mm×10mm area in a central part of one of the opposite outer surfaces of theperipheral wall portion of the tube material in the width direction ofthe tube was kept exposed. Furthermore, the sample piece for measuringthe electric potential of the sacrificial anode portion (18)(sacrificial anode material) was cut into two half pieces in a planeextending in the longitudinal direction (axial direction of the tube) ofthe cross sectional flat shape such that the thickness of each halfpiece was ½ of the thickness of the original sample piece, and theentirety of each of the two half pieces other than the end face to whichthe lead line for electric measurement was connected was masked with thesilicone resin, such that a 10 mm×10 mm area in a central part of thesacrificial anode portion (18) in the width direction of the half pieceremains exposed, so as to be electrically insulated.

To measure the electric potential, the following method was employed: asa reference electrode, a saturated KCl calomel electrode (SCE) was used,while a 5% NaCl solution adjusted to have pH3 with an acetic acid wasused as a test solution; the solution was stirred at room temperature;the sample was immersed in the solution for 24 hours; and then theelectric potential of each of the samples was measured.

The result obtained by the above measurement with respect to thedifferences of the electric potential between the tube materials and thesacrificial anode materials is shown in Table 3 below. The differencesof the electric potential between the tube materials and the sacrificialanode materials are evaluated as “Excellent” where the difference is notless than 5 mV and not more than 300 mV, “Good” where the difference ismore than 0 mV and less than 5 mV or more than 300 mV, and “Poor” wherethe difference is 0 mV.

TABLE 3 Difference Kind of flat of potential multi-port tube (mV)Evaluation Present A 150 Excellent invention B 3 Good C 10 Excellent D100 Excellent E 250 Excellent F 350 Good G 100 Excellent H 150 ExcellentComparative I 0 Poor examples J 150 Excellent

As is apparent from the result of measurement of the electric potentialshown in Table 3, each of the flat multi-port tubes A-H according to theinvention has the difference of the electric potential of 3-350 mVbetween the sacrificial anode portion (18) (the sacrificial anodematerial) and the tube material after the expected heating for brazing,indicating that a sufficient sacrificial anode effect was achieved.

On the other hand, with respect to the sample based on the flatmulti-port tube I according to the comparative example, the differenceof the electric potential was 0 mV since the flat multi-port tube wasformed only from the tube material as the conventional tube, withoutincluding the sacrificial anode material.

Furthermore, the difference of the electric potential was measured bythe same method as described above with respect to the sample based onthe flat multi-port tube J according to the comparative example, aswell. The difference of the electric potential between the sacrificialanode portion (18) (the sacrificial anode material) and the tubematerial after the expected heating for brazing was 150 mV, indicatingthat a sufficient sacrificial anode effect was achieved.

(3) Evaluation of the Corrosion-Resistance

With respect to each of the flat multi-port tubes A-H according to theinvention and the flat multi-port tubes I and J according to thecomparative examples which were obtained as described above, the OYwater (Old Yokohama river water) immersion test was performed toevaluate the corrosion-resistance effect of the inner surfaces of eachtube. It is noted that the OY water immersion test is a method ofevaluating the corrosion-resistance of the inner surfaces including thefollowing steps. First, sodium chloride: 0.026 g, sodium sulfate(anhydride): 0.089 g, cupric chloride (dihydrate): 0.003 g and ferricchloride (hexahydrate): 0.145 g are dissolved in 1 L of pure water toobtain a test solution, and only the inner surfaces of theabove-described samples are exposed to and immersed in the testsolution. Then, the samples are held at 80° C. for 8 hours, and thenheld at room temperature for 16 hours. The above steps constitute onecycle, and the cycle is repeated 30, 60 or 90 times.

Described more specifically, each of the flat multi-port tubes A-Haccording to the invention and the flat multi-port tubes I and Jaccording to the comparative examples was subjected to the heattreatment at 600° C. for 3 minutes in view of heating of the tube uponbrazing for joining of the fins where the tube is used as a heattransfer tube for a heat-exchanger, and was cut into pieces each havinga length of 100 mm in the longitudinal direction of the extrusion. Then,outer surfaces and opposite end faces of the samples were all maskedwith a silicone resin to be electrically insulated. Subsequently, thesamples masked with the silicone resin were kept immersed in theabove-described OY test solution for 8 hours, while the OY test solutionwas stirred at 80° C., and further held for 16 hours after the heatingand stirring operations were stopped. The above steps constituted onecycle, and the cycle was repeated 30, 60 and 90 times for each tube sothat the corrosion-resistance of the tube was evaluated for threedifferent periods of time.

With respect to each of the samples subjected to the above-describedtest of evaluation of the corrosion-resistance, the silicone sealantresin on the surfaces of the samples was peeled off, and then a productgenerated as a result of the corrosion on the surfaces of the sampleswas removed by immersing the sample in a phosphoric acid/chromic acidsolution whose temperature was raised by a heater. The samples wereexamined as to whether they had penetration holes on their surfaces ornot. Furthermore, the samples whose corrosion products were peeled offwere cut into two half pieces in a plane extending in the longitudinaldirection (axial direction) of the tube having the cross sectional flatshape, such that the thickness of each piece was ½ of the thickness ofthe original sample. Each of the two half pieces was covered with anembedding resin, subjected to a cross section processing by awater-proof paper with respect to the maximum corrosion portion, andfurther subjected to a mirror finish by buffing. Then, the corrosionstate of the inner surfaces of the flow passages of each sample wasexamined. It is noted that, with respect to the samples used in theabove-described test, the result is evaluated as “Excellent” in the casewhere the penetration did not occur after 60 cycles but occurred after90 cycles, or no penetration occurred at all; “Good” in the case wherethe penetration did not occur after 30 cycles but occurred after 60cycles; and “Poor” in the case where the penetration occurred after 30cycles.

In Table 4, the result of the above-described OY water immersion test interms of 30, 60 and 90 cycles performed on each of the flat multi-porttubes A-H according to the invention and the flat multi-port tubes I andJ according to the comparative examples is shown.

TABLE 4 Kind of flat Result of OY water multi-port tube immersion testEvaluation Present A No penetration Excellent invention B Penetrationafter 60 cycles Good C Penetration after 60 cycles Good D Penetrationafter 90 cycles Excellent E No penetration Excellent F Penetration after60 cycles Good G Penetration after 90 cycles Excellent H Penetrationafter 60 cycles Good Comparative I Penetration after 30 cycles Poorexamples J Penetration after 30 cycles Poor

As is apparent from the result shown in Table 4, it was recognized thatthe flat multi-port tubes A-H according to the invention did not sufferfrom generation of any penetration holes formed through the tubeperipheral portion, with respect to the evaluation after 30 cycles ofthe OY water immersion test. With respect to the evaluation after 60cycles, penetration holes formed through the tube peripheral portionwere observed in the flat multi-port tubes B, C, F and H. Furthermore,with respect to the evaluation after 90 cycles, no penetration holeformed through the tube peripheral portion was observed in any of theflat multi-port tubes except for the flat multi-port tubes B, C, F andH. Therefore, it was recognized that all of the flat multi-port tubesA-H according to the invention enjoyed the sufficient internalcorrosion-resistance owing to the sacrificial anode effect by theexistence of the sacrificial anode portion (18).

On the other hand, since the flat multi-port tube I according to thecomparative example was the tube wherein only the conventional tubematerial was employed and the sacrificial anode material was notincluded, it was found that corrosion holes formed through the tubeperipheral portion were generated with respect to the evaluations afterall of the OY water immersion tests of 30, 60 and 90 cycles. It wasrecognized that the penetration occurred at an early stage because thetube did not have the sacrificial anode portion (18) around the flowpassages, contrary to the flat multi-port tubes according to theinvention, and the tube did not enjoy the sacrificial anode effect toachieve the intended internal corrosion-resistance.

With respect to the flat multi-port tube J according to the comparativeexample, it was found that corrosion holes formed through the peripheralwall portion were generated with respect to the evaluations after all of30, 60 and 90 cycles of the same OY water immersion test as describedabove. The formation of the corrosion holes was observed at the oppositeend portions in the width direction of the flat multi-port tubes,wherein the sacrificial anode portion (18) was not formed. It wasrecognized that, as in the case of the above-described flat multi-porttube I, the penetration occurred at an early stage because the tube didnot have the sacrificial anode portion (18) around the flow passages andthe tube did not enjoy the sacrificial anode effect to achieve theintended internal corrosion-resistance.

Example 2

As in Example 1, the composite billet (a) obtained in Example 1 wassubjected to the hot extrusion using a plurality of porthole dies havinga different size of portholes, so that the flat multi-port tubes AA toAH shown in the following Table 5, which tubes have eight rectangularholes (eight flow passages) shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, were produced. Theobtained various flat multi-port tubes were examined with respect totheir transverse sections, and measured with respect to the thickness(Twi) of the internal partition wall portions (16 b) in their centralpart in the width direction of the tube, the thickness (Twe) of theinternal partition wall portions (16 a) at their end portions in thewidth direction of the tube, the thickness (Tmin) of the thinnest partof the internal partition wall portions (16), and the width (Tb) of theupper and lower connecting parts (16 c) of the internal partition wallportions (16). The result is shown in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Structure of flat multi-port tube Thickness of internalThickness of internal partition wall portion partition wall portionThickness of thinnest Width of connecting Kind of flat in central partin the at end portions in the part of internal parts of internalmulti-port width direction width direction of tube partition wallportion partition wall portion tube (Twi: mm) (Twe: mm) (Tmin: mm) (Tb:mm) AA 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 AB 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 AC 0.16 0.4 0.16 0.66 AD 0.160.4 0.16 0.8 AE 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 AF 0.24 0.4 0.24 1 AG 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 AH0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2

With respect to each of the obtained flat multi-port tubes AA to AH, therange of formation of the sacrificial anode portion (18) in thetransverse section was measured as in the case of the above-describedExample 1, and the result is shown in the following Table 6 as the stateof formation of the sacrificial anode portion (18). Furthermore, each ofthe flat multi-port tubes was subjected to 30, 60 and 90 cycles of theOY water immersion test as in the case of Example 1 to evaluate thecorrosion-resistance, and the test result is shown in Table 6. It isnoted that, in the OY water immersion test, the result is evaluated as“Excellent” in the case where the penetration into the internalpartition wall portions (16) did not occur after 60 cycles but occurredafter 90 cycles, or no penetration occurred at all; “Good” in the casewhere the penetration into the internal partition wall portions (16) didnot occur after 30 cycles but occurred after 60 cycles; and “Poor” inthe case where the penetration into the internal partition wall portions(16) occurred after 30 cycles.

TABLE 6 State of formation of sacrificial anode portion (18) Flow Flowpassages OY water immersion test passages (12b) in Internal InternalPeripheral Corrosion (12a) at central part partition wall partition wallwall portion state of Corrosion end in the width portion (16a) portions(16b) (14) of internal state of portions in direction at end portions incentral part each flow partition wall connecting the width Smallest inthe width in the width passage portions (16a) parts (16c) of Kind offlat direction value of direction direction Largest at end portionsinternal multi-port Peripheral peripheral Largest Largest thickness inthe width partition wall tube length (%) length (%) thickness (%)thickness (%) (%) direction portions AA 20 50 100 100 0 Poor Good AB 2050 100 100 0 Excellent Good AC 20 50 100 100 0 Excellent Good AD 20 50100 100 0 Excellent Excellent AE 20 50 100 100 0 Poor Excellent AF 20 50100 100 0 Excellent Excellent AG 20 50 100 100 0 Poor Poor AH 20 50 100100 0 Good Poor

As shown in Table 6, with respect to each of the flat multi-port tubesAA to AH, the ratio of the existence of the sacrificial anode portion(18) in the peripheral wall portions (14) partially defining the flowpassages (12 a) positioned at the opposite end portions was 0% and thetube material was exposed to the inner surfaces of the flow passages,while the sacrificial anode portion (18) were formed at the internalpartition wall portions (16 a) separating the flow passages (12 a)positioned at the opposite end portions from the flow passages (12 b)adjacent to them, with a thickness equivalent to that of the endportions of the internal partition wall portions (16 a). The ratio ofexposure of the sacrificial anode portion (18) was equivalent to 20% ofthe entire peripheral length of the flow passages (12 a) positioned atthe opposite end portions. The ratio of existence of the sacrificialanode portion (18) at the peripheral wall portions (14) defining theflow passages (12 b) positioned at locations other than the opposite endportions of the tube in the width direction was 0% and the tube materialwas exposed to the inner surfaces of the flow passages, while thesacrificial anode portion (18) was formed at the internal partition wallportions (16 b) defining the flow passages (12 b) positioned at thelocations other than the opposite end portions of the tube in the widthdirection, with a thickness equivalent to that of the internal partitionwall portions (16 b). The smallest value of the ratio of exposure of thesacrificial anode portion (18) was equivalent to 50% of the entireperipheral length of the flow passages (12 b).

As the result of the OY water immersion test with respect to the flatmulti-port tubes AA to AH, it was found that each of the flat multi-porttubes did not suffer from generation of corrosion holes formed throughits peripheral wall portions (14) even after 90 cycles of the test.

As to the corrosion of the internal partition wall portions (16) in eachof the flat multi-port tubes AA, AE and AG, the sacrificial anodeportion (18) at the internal partition wall portions (16 a) partiallydefining the flow passages (12 a) positioned at the end portions in thewidth direction were preferentially subjected to the corrosion, so thatcorrosion holes formed through the internal partition wall portions (16a) were observed after 30 cycles of the OY water immersion test. In theflat multi-port tubes AB-AD and AF, the thickness (Twe) of the internalpartition wall portions (16 a) partially defining the flow passages (12a) positioned at the opposite end portions in the width direction of theflat multi-port tube was set to be larger than the thickness (Twi) ofthe internal partition wall portions (16 b) positioned in the centralpart of the flat multi-port tube in the width direction relative to theinternal partition wall portions (16 a), whereby penetration holes dueto the corrosion were not generated even after 60 cycles of the OY waterimmersion test. Furthermore, it was found that some of the flatmulti-port tubes did not suffer from corrosion holes formed through theinternal partition wall portions (16 a) positioned at the end portionseven after 90 cycles of the test.

Furthermore, in the flat multi-port tubes AG and AH, because the widthof the connecting parts (16 c) of the internal partition wall portions(16) was not sufficient, the connecting parts (16 c) in the upper andthe lower parts of the internal partition wall portions (16) werepreferentially subjected to the corrosion due to the difference of theelectric potential, with the tube material being exposed to the innersurfaces of the flow passages (12) at the peripheral wall portions (14),whereby the penetration by the corrosion of the internal partition wallportions (16) was recognized after 30 cycles of the OY water immersiontest. On the other hand, in the flat multi-port tubes AD-AF, the width(Tb) of the connecting parts (16 c) in the upper and lower parts of theinternal partition wall portions (16) was set to be larger than thethickness (Tm in) of the thinnest part of the internal partition wallportions (16) so that the preferential corrosion of the sacrificialanode portion (18) positioned in the connecting parts (16 c) of theinternal partition wall portions (16) was advantageously reduced,whereby penetration holes due to the corrosion were not generated in theinternal partition wall portions (16) even after 60 cycles of the OYwater immersion test. Furthermore, it was found that some of the flatmulti-port tubes did not suffer from corrosion holes even after 90cycles of the test.

DESCRIPTION OF NUMERALS

-   -   10 flat multi-port tube    -   12 flow passages (hollow holes)    -   14 peripheral wall portions    -   16 internal partition wall portions    -   18 sacrificial anode portion    -   20 composite billet    -   30 single-component billet    -   22, 32 tube billet    -   24 sacrificial anode billet

1. An aluminum multi-port tube with a generally flat cross sectionalshape obtained by extruding an aluminum material, the aluminummulti-port tube being an extruded tube which has a plurality of flowpassages extending independently of each other in an axial direction ofthe tube, the flow passages being arranged in a longitudinal directionof the flat cross sectional shape via internal partition wall portionsextending in the axial direction of the tube in a peripheral wallportion of the tube, characterized in that: the aluminum multi-port tubeis formed by extrusion wherein an aluminum tube material and an aluminumsacrificial anode material having an electrochemically lower potentialthan the aluminum tube material are employed as said aluminum material,and the aluminum sacrificial anode material is exposed to form asacrificial anode portion at least in a part of an inner circumferentialportion in cross section of each of the plurality of flow passages,whereby the aluminum multi-port tube has an excellent internalcorrosion-resistance.
 2. The aluminum multi-port tube according to claim1, wherein an entirety of the internal partition wall portions isessentially formed of the sacrificial anode portion, such that theinternal partition wall portions have a thickness which permitssuppression or prevention of penetration due to corrosion of theperipheral wall portion of the tube.
 3. The aluminum multi-port tubeaccording to claim 1, wherein, in the inner circumferential portion inthe cross section of each of the plurality of flow passages, thealuminum sacrificial anode material is exposed to form the sacrificialanode portion in the internal partition wall portions, while thealuminum tube material is exposed in the peripheral wall portion of thetube other than the internal partition wall portions.
 4. The aluminummulti-port tube according to claim 1, wherein the sacrificial anodeportion exists at the internal partition wall portion positioned betweenadjacent ones of the plurality of flow passages, in a ratio not higherthan 100% of a thickness of the internal partition wall portion.
 5. Thealuminum multi-port tube according to claim 1, wherein the sacrificialanode portion exists at the peripheral wall portion other than theinternal partition wall portions, in a ratio not higher than 90% of athickness of the peripheral wall portion.
 6. The aluminum multi-porttube according to claim 1, wherein a difference of a potential betweenthe aluminum sacrificial anode material and the aluminum tube materialis not less than 5 mV and not more than 300 mV.
 7. The aluminummulti-port tube according to claim 1, wherein the sacrificial anodeportion is formed along at least 10% of a peripheral length of each flowpassage in cross section of the tube, and exposed to an inner surface ofthe flow passage.
 8. The aluminum multi-port tube according to claim 1,wherein the internal partition wall portions positioned at opposite endportions in the longitudinal direction of the flat cross sectionalshape, among the internal partition wall portions existing betweenadjacent ones of the plurality of flow passages, have a larger thicknessthan that of the other internal partition wall portions.
 9. The aluminummulti-port tube according to claim 1, wherein the internal partitionwall portion positioned between adjacent ones of the plurality of flowpassages extends with a thickness increasing continuously or stepwisefrom the thinnest part of the internal partition wall portion towardopposite sides of the peripheral wall portion which are joined by theinternal partition wall portion, and are joined to said opposite sidesof the peripheral wall portion by connecting parts having a thicknesslarger than that of the thinnest part of the internal partition wallportion.
 10. An aluminum heat exchanger comprising the aluminummulti-port tube according to claim 1 and aluminum outer fins brazed onan outer surface of the aluminum multi-port tube.